1. But really, inside family history, we knowthat for each and every laws you will find an exclusion. A beneficial vexing section ofgenealogy is the fact nobody really knows how to put on the new exceptions orrules with any definitive adjective for example constantly, perhaps, probably,most likely, etcetera. It will be interesting when the there most other instances ofjointures getting produced per year otherwise a couple once a well-known relationship day.

dos. Is there an extant dispensation on the wedding off ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes have been third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, after taken off the fresh fifth LordClifford? Who does narrow down the relationships go out.

Arthur

Allegedly, in the event that an effective dispensation was sought for and you will offered, it can havebeen from the among the many pursuing the, that will are available in this new correspondingregister guide, whether it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out-of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop regarding Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop away from Carlisle 1509-1520

5. Should your 10th Lord Clifford does marry in early 1487 [state January] andhas Age afterwards where year, do the fresh chronology perhaps not really works?

John arms?

E created into the later 1487, Henry created when you look at the 1488/9, Joan into the ,etcetera. completing the names of one’s upload away from . In the event the (a) thechronology however performs; and you will (b) their particular matrimony section was not lower; thenwe only have the 1505 pedigree regarding Henry VII’s that’s for the oppositionto brand new supposition that she is a legitimate child.

6. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Certainly are the Clifford daughters the latest onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Have there been others? If that’s the case,would not you to definitely mirror improperly with this document as a resource?

From reviews I’ve made of the c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of your own Northern pedigrees, that are

In the c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, the Clifford youngsters are not listedin a great Clifford pedigree, but instead on the St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot familiar with the newest St. John family relations, following the is the pointers asit looks throughout the c.1505 pedigree, just like the taken from the new 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. blog post. The fresh phrasing within the quotations is strictly since it appears inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”Of my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess of Somerset got around three webbplats lГ¤nk husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My personal Woman the latest King’s Mom.” that has “The newest Queen.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first partner.” she got 3 daus & dos sons:

A good. “Edith, wedded to help you Geoffrey Rod off Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded towards Lady Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke off Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you’re able to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[another type of youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded in order to Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun out of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you will sistren.” With issueindicated, however titled.C2. “Age, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “E, wedded earliest towards the Lord Zouche; shortly after to your LordScrope of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated not named.

Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, because of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. from K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Age.”